Another
possible hypothesis that may relate to the existence of ghosts is Quantum
Bioholography.
Complex information can be encoded in EM fields, as we all know from coding
and decoding of television and radio signals. Even more complex information
can be encoded in holographic images.
DNA acts as a holographic projector of acoustic and EM information which
contains the informational quintessence of the biohologram. Only 3% of
human DNA encodes the physical body. The remaining 97% of the 3 billion
base pair genome contains over a million genetic structures called transposons
that have the capacity to jump from one chromosomal location to another
(Kelleher, 1999). We are 99.9% alike in our genetic legacy. Our individuality
is expressed in three million small variations in our cells, called single
nucleotide polymorphisms.
Gene-expression is the mechanism by which new patterns are called into
being (Rossi, 2000). There is also a strong correlation between modulation
of the brain’s EM field and consciousness (Persinger, 1987; McFadden,
2002). The Gariaev group has discovered a wave-based genome and DNA phantom
effect which strongly supports the holographic concept of reality (Miller,
Webb, Dickson, 1975). This main information channel of DNA is the same
for both photons and radio waves. Superposed coherent waves of different
types in the cells interact to form diffraction patterns, firstly in the
acoustic domain, secondly in the electromagnetic domain, a quantum hologram,
a translation process between acoustical and optical holograms.
Nature works through self-organization at the creative
edge of chaos (Gleick, Peat), and so do we. Complexity is the fine line
between chaos and order, "a chaos of behaviors in which the components
of the system never quite lock into place, yet never quite dissolve into
turbulence either" (Waldrop, 1992, p. 293). The creative edge of
chaos is a transition phase.
Self-reinforcing, autopoeitic morphogenesis creates
specific forms. Yet a meta-theory eludes us. We still don’t know exactly
how that works; there is currently no consensus in quantum physics at
the level of the unified field, but we have many working theories which
help us grope our way toward understanding. Likewise, there is no generally
accepted paradigm in consciousness studies. Ambiguity surrounding our
psychophysical Mystery also shows up in the split between conventional
allopathic and energy medicine.
The brain is not confined to our skull, but permeates
our whole being through the intracellular matrix and sensory system, as
well as the strong EM fields generated by the beating heart. Research
suggests activities in the brain may be pre-conditioned by the DC field
of the organism (Oschmann; Becker). Our molecular system extends beyond
the nervous system and is the bedrock of intuitive, subconscious and unconscious
processes.
Hypnosis suggests the fabric of the body also helps store our memories,
embodying our triumphs and traumas. Ideomotor signalling (Rossi) can elicit
revelations about ourselves not available from our conscious minds. There
is a reciprocal action between our inchoate perceptions, thoughts and
the chemistry of our bodies, and therefore our current and future states.
Acoustical holography employs sound waves to create
a movement on a surface that is used as the basis for creation of an optical
hologram. So we essentially convert between a pattern of sound waves reflected
off an object in space into a pattern of light waves that can reconstruct
the shape of that object. We have a transformation between two levels
of vibration, two media as it were, preserving a pattern in space. (Miller
and Webb, 1973).
Returning to the recent Russian discoveries (Gariaev,
and reporter Poponin), which seem to confirm the seminal discovery of
Miller and Webb: both quantitative and qualitative data are crucial for
the development of a new unified nonlinear quantum field theory which
includes the physical theory of consciousness. The DNA phantom field effect
may be interpreted as a manifestation of a new physical vacuum structure
which has been previously overlooked. It is perhaps a specific example
of a more general category of electromagnetic phantom effects.
Results of the experiments as described by Poponin
showed that when DNA was put in a scattering chamber and bombarded with
laser light a "phantom" was revealed, even when the DNA itself
had been removed. They bombarded it with weak coherent laser radiation
in two frequencies. The intensity of the scattered light was measured,
as well as non-linear localized excitations.
They found a surprise effect while measuring the vibrational modes of
DNA in solution using a sophisticated “MALVERN” laser photon correlation
spectrometer (LPCS), which tests the fluctuation dynamics of DNA solutions.
“In each set of experimental measurements
with DNA samples, several double control measurements are performed. These
measurements are performed prior to the DNA being placed in the scattering
chamber. When the scattering chamber of the LPCS is void of physical DNA,
and neither are there any phantom DNA fields present, the autocorrelation
function of scattered light looks like the one shown in Figure 2a. This
typical control plot represents only background random noise counts of
the photomultiplier. Note that the intensity of the background noise counts
is very small and the distribution of the number of counters per channel
is close to random. Figure 2b demonstrates a typical time autocorrelation
functions when a physical DNA sample is placed in the scattering chamber,
and typically has the shape of an oscillatory and slowly exponentially
decaying function.
When the DNA is removed from the scattering
chamber, one anticipates that the autocorrelation function will be the
same as before the DNA was placed in the scattering chamber. Surprisingly
and counter-intuitively it turns out that the autocorrelation function
measured just after the removal of the DNA from the scattering chamber
looks distinctly different from the one obtained before the DNA was placed
in the chamber. . . Two conditions are necessary in order to observe DNA
phantoms. The first is the presence of the DNA molecules and the second
is the exposure of the DNA to weak coherent laser radiation.” (Poponin).
Researchers hypothesize that some new field structure
is being excited from the physical vacuum substructure. As long as the
chamber is not disturbed, it is measurable for long periods of time. What
is measured is light scattering from the DNA phantom fields. What is attained
is qualitative and quantitative information about the nonlinear dynamical
properties of the phantom DNA fields. Its origin is related to physical
DNA. As yet, they have found no other substance which recreates or emulates
the effect of the DNA molecule. This
suggests that the electromagnetic phantom effect is a more fundamental
phenomenon which can be used to explain other observed phantom effects,
though not to be confused with the often misinterpreted secondary emission
of electrons seen in Kirlian Photography and dubbed "phantoms."
[ref. R.A. Miller on "The Physical Mechanisms of Kirlian Photography,"
Psychoenergetic Systems, Stanley Krippner, ed., 1974]. Evidence suggests
a relationship to the phenomena of [endogenous] bioluminescence, liquid
crystals, and superconductivity, which we intend to pursue, elsewhere.
Bioluminescence can be considered an indicator
of life activity. It is the emission of photons of light produced when
certain energized electrons drop into a lower or ground state. A common
example is the visible light (or electromagnetic radiation) generated
by the firefly. The importance of this phenomenon is seen by taking the
broad view of the life process as we know it: photons from the sun excite
electrons here on earth; this high energy state is transformed into high
energy phosphate bonds by the process of photosynthesis; the release of
the energy stored in these bonds is the fuel of life; electrons are transferred
between molecules in a downward cascade fashion to lower energy states;
this action produces the electric current that produces the motion that
we call life. (Miller, 1974).
Entities can also luminescence at higher frequencies than the normal visible
spectrum, such as in the UV or microwave region. It has been shown that
the human being is an emitter of various electromagnetic radiations. Different
emissions correspond to different body structures across the emission
spectrum. These electromagnetic radiations are of course indicative of
the energy state of the organism, so is it possible that ghosts could
be created from the same phenomena? |
